Are there any recommended philosophy books? -4
Philosophy: Not for the Young or Timid
Only after experiencing something firsthand can you truly understand it. History infuses certain things into your soul, guiding your intuition to convey them to the world through your writing. The writer is simply a mouthpiece, and does not actually grasp the full meaning of the words they are writing. Their age is irrelevant.
The true soil and nutrients for the seed are those who are meant to hear, remember, and ponder those words. These are the people who truly interpret the message and transform it into something new. Not the messenger.
Don’t think that a few examples can overturn the statement that philosophy is not something young people can learn to master. In fact, I don’t recommend that undergraduates “study philosophy” as a hobby.
Philosophy is not something that can be “studied” well. Philosophy textbooks typically focus on two things: the history of philosophy and the research tools of philosophy. The former is roughly equivalent to the paintings of predecessors, and the latter is roughly equivalent to the basic tools of painting, such as perspective theory and color theory.
However, the essence of philosophy is the art of thinking. Philosophers must be thinkers, and thinkers are essentially artists.
As an art form, philosophy cannot rely on “no contradictions with predecessors + correct use of tools” to guarantee the value and meaning of its conclusions. It simply cannot.
Many people approach “studying philosophy” with the belief that it is a subject like physics and engineering that can be mastered by grasping some undisputed knowledge and skills. This is a huge mistake.
The criteria for good philosophy has nothing to do with “right or wrong”. Its true standard is whether it is beautiful enough.
Always remember this basic fact: humans fundamentally do not know what truth and goodness are. We only have an intuition about beauty. We grope for the face of truth and goodness through the pursuit of beauty, and are in fact absolutely ruled by the simple logic of “the more beautiful, the more true; the more beautiful, the more good.”
While studying coloring techniques and line drawing methods, and referencing masterpieces, can help you paint pleasing wares, that is not art, nor does it make you an artist. Just as painting like that until death only makes you a painter, studying like that until death does not make you a real philosopher.
If not a real philosopher, then what is it? A pitiful creature who can only package their own greed, desires, and cowardice in elegant academic language. Their so-called “thinking” is all spent on layer after layer of packaging.